Uploaded image for project: 'JBoss Transaction Manager'
  1. JBoss Transaction Manager
  2. JBTM-444

Slow memory leak in BaseTransaction



    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: 4.2.3.SP5, 4.2.3.SP6, 4.2.3.SP7
    • Fix Version/s: 4.2.3.SP8, 4.2.3.CP05, 4.6.0
    • Component/s: JTA
    • Labels:
    • Environment:

      Windows XP and Solaris, Java 1.5.0_14, JBoss 4.2.2 (so with JBossTS 4.2.3_SP6, but the problem is still there in SP7)


      We had JBossAS running for approximately 4 weeks under extremely heavy load, and reached an OutOfMemory condition. Heap Dump analysis showed that the class com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.BaseTransaction dominated 85% of the heap space.

      In the class com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.BaseTransaction, there is a private Hashtable _timeouts, into which a thread id and a timeout value are placed when transactions are started. However, the entries in the hashtable are never removed, even if the thread dies. Given all the JBossAS invokers for EJBs create/destroy worker threads, it means that client transactions can leak approximately 600 bytes (the String, Integer and Hashtable$Entry).

      The _timeouts table in our heap dump had some 6 million entries and a retained heap size of over 1Gb.

      Our workaround to the problem is that we are actively monitoring heap size and performing rolling restarts when the heap space is too low.

      You may want to consider using a ThreadLocal to store the timeout instead of a Hashtable, which would accomplish the goal of storing the timeout value per thread, but would be collected if the Thread died, but I will leave implementation speculation to you unless I find the time to submit a patch.

        Gliffy Diagrams


          1. JBTM-444.patch
            2 kB
          2. matscreenshot.png
            363 kB
          3. mat-screenshot-1.jpg
            216 kB

            Issue Links



                • Assignee:
                  jhalliday Jonathan Halliday
                  amcdowell Andrew McDowell
                • Votes:
                  0 Vote for this issue
                  0 Start watching this issue


                  • Created: